And why should the public have access to these again?

**imported_elp6n** · October 28th, 2008, 04:24 PM

Curious as to if the father had to sign a waiver of liability before he allowed the child to participate...

**PVVikeFan** · October 28th, 2008, 04:25 PM

I would assume so. That would make sense anyway.
No matter what it's just very tragic.

**CoeburnCane** · October 28th, 2008, 04:55 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVVikeFan</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To be honest I have no use for an assault rifle. I don't understand why this kid was learning to shoot one. The parent, in my opinion, is at fault here. </div></div>

Co-sign 110%.

October 28th, 2008, 05:08 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dick_Vitale</div><div class="ubbcode-body">you know gun right and abortion are kind of similar. So what the dad and kid wanted to shoot a gun. its their right correct? similar to abortion. if a woman wants to have an abortion so be it. i mean of course the possibility of killing yourself with these guns are apparent but i mean it is their right as well as abortion. </div></div>
If you had an abortion, it probably wouldn't shoot someone in another family.

**imported_ndn10** · October 28th, 2008, 05:55 PM

killing is killing

**NotSoSilentBob** · October 28th, 2008, 06:01 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When the 1st amendment was put it place, I am guessing the founding fathers never anticipated the advances in media we would have to day. Just because its a "blog" doesnt mean the public should have access to them. Can you comprehend that? </div></div>

**R13** · October 28th, 2008, 06:08 PM

Nice rebuttal.

**R13** · October 28th, 2008, 06:09 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dick_Vitale</div><div class="ubbcode-body">killing is killing </div></div>

Exactly, thats why all pro-life and pro-death penalty people are hypocrites.

**imported_GC1** · October 28th, 2008, 06:09 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When the 2nd amendment was put it place, I am guessing the founding fathers never anticipated the advances in weaponry we would have to day. Just because its a "gun" doesnt mean the public should have access to them. Can you comprehend that? </div></div>

Do you even have a clue as to why the 2nd Amendment is even IN the Constitution? It guarantees the right to bear arms. Do you know why?

**BlueWahooChambordDevil** · October 28th, 2008, 06:13 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R13</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dick_Vitale</div><div class="ubbcode-body">killing is killing </div></div>

Exactly, thats why all pro-life and pro-death penalty people are hypocrites. </div></div>
killing might be killing.....but simply exercising your 2nd amendment right to own a gun isnt killing